[PATCH 1/2] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Hey,

On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou:
>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy,
>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>>>
>>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
>>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
>>>
>>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0
>>>
>>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou at amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>>
>> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
> 
> Dave, Maarten,
> 
> Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree?
This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches.

~Maarten