[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: allways add the VM clear duplicate
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Wed Jul 8 09:33:06 PDT 2015
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Christian König
<deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
> On 08.07.2015 18:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Christian König
>> <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08.07.2015 17:57, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Christian König
>>>> <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to allways add the VM clear duplicate of the BO_VA,
>>>>> no matter what the old status was.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>> Test-by: hadack at gmx.de
>>>>
>>>> This patch does not apply cleanly. It also adds an undefined label
>>>> error_unreserve. Is there an additional patch required?
>>>
>>>
>>> That's possible, but I thought the depending patch would have already
>>> been
>>> upstream.
>>>
>>> Can you create a drm-fixes-4.2 branch I can rebase on?
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-fixes-4.2-wip
>
>
> Ah, here is the problem. This branch don't yet contains the fixes which went
> upstream with 4.1.
>
> What should we do? I don't want to change those patches and create a merge
> conflict when you merge in 4.1.
I'll rebase by tree on Linus' tree. Dave is on vacation so his tree is lagging.
Alex
>
> Christian.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c | 34
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
>>>>> index ec10533..0310965 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
>>>>> @@ -493,29 +493,27 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(struct radeon_device
>>>>> *rdev,
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> if (bo_va->it.start || bo_va->it.last) {
>>>>> - spin_lock(&vm->status_lock);
>>>>> - if (list_empty(&bo_va->vm_status)) {
>>>>> - /* add a clone of the bo_va to clear the old
>>>>> address */
>>>>> - struct radeon_bo_va *tmp;
>>>>> - spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>>>> - tmp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_bo_va),
>>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> - if (!tmp) {
>>>>> - mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
>>>>> - r = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> - goto error_unreserve;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - tmp->it.start = bo_va->it.start;
>>>>> - tmp->it.last = bo_va->it.last;
>>>>> - tmp->vm = vm;
>>>>> - tmp->bo = radeon_bo_ref(bo_va->bo);
>>>>> - spin_lock(&vm->status_lock);
>>>>> - list_add(&tmp->vm_status, &vm->freed);
>>>>> + /* add a clone of the bo_va to clear the old address */
>>>>> + struct radeon_bo_va *tmp;
>>>>> + tmp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_bo_va), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> + if (!tmp) {
>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
>>>>> + r = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> + goto error_unreserve;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>>>> + tmp->it.start = bo_va->it.start;
>>>>> + tmp->it.last = bo_va->it.last;
>>>>> + tmp->vm = vm;
>>>>> + tmp->bo = radeon_bo_ref(bo_va->bo);
>>>>>
>>>>> interval_tree_remove(&bo_va->it, &vm->va);
>>>>> bo_va->it.start = 0;
>>>>> bo_va->it.last = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + spin_lock(&vm->status_lock);
>>>>> + list_del_init(&bo_va->vm_status);
>>>>> + list_add(&tmp->vm_status, &vm->freed);
>>>>> + spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> if (soffset || eoffset) {
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list