[PATCH v2] drm/amdkfd: validate pdd where it acquired first
Maninder Singh
maninder1.s at samsung.com
Thu Jul 9 02:11:53 PDT 2015
Currently pdd is validate after dereferencing it, which is
not correct, Thus validate pdd before its first use.
Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s at samsung.com>
---
v1: remove validation of pdd after its usage
v2: do validation at first place rather than removing
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index 8a1f999..9be0070 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -420,6 +420,12 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(struct kfd_dev *dev, unsigned int pasid)
pqm_uninit(&p->pqm);
pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
+
+ if (!pdd) {
+ mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (pdd->reset_wavefronts) {
dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(pdd->dev, p);
pdd->reset_wavefronts = false;
@@ -431,8 +437,7 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(struct kfd_dev *dev, unsigned int pasid)
* We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here
* because the IOMMU called us.
*/
- if (pdd)
- pdd->bound = false;
+ pdd->bound = false;
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
}
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list