[PATCH] drm/tegra: dpaux: Fix transfers larger than 4 bytes
Steev Klimaszewski
threeway at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 00:39:36 PDT 2015
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
>
> The DPAUX read/write FIFO registers aren't sequential in the register
> space, causing transfers larger than 4 bytes to cause accesses to non-
> existing FIFO registers.
>
> Fixes: 6b6b604215c6 ("drm/tegra: Add eDP support")
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
> index d6b55e3e3716..a43a836e6f88 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
> @@ -72,34 +72,32 @@ static inline void tegra_dpaux_writel(struct
> tegra_dpaux *dpaux,
> static void tegra_dpaux_write_fifo(struct tegra_dpaux *dpaux, const u8
> *buffer,
> size_t size)
> {
> - unsigned long offset = DPAUX_DP_AUXDATA_WRITE(0);
> size_t i, j;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < size; i += 4) {
> - size_t num = min_t(size_t, size - i, 4);
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(size, 4); i++) {
> + size_t num = min_t(size_t, size - i * 4, 4);
> unsigned long value = 0;
>
> for (j = 0; j < num; j++)
> - value |= buffer[i + j] << (j * 8);
> + value |= buffer[i * 4 + j] << (j * 8);
>
> - tegra_dpaux_writel(dpaux, value, offset++);
> + tegra_dpaux_writel(dpaux, value,
> DPAUX_DP_AUXDATA_WRITE(i));
> }
> }
>
> static void tegra_dpaux_read_fifo(struct tegra_dpaux *dpaux, u8 *buffer,
> size_t size)
> {
> - unsigned long offset = DPAUX_DP_AUXDATA_READ(0);
> size_t i, j;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < size; i += 4) {
> - size_t num = min_t(size_t, size - i, 4);
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(size, 4); i++) {
> + size_t num = min_t(size_t, size - i * 4, 4);
> unsigned long value;
>
> - value = tegra_dpaux_readl(dpaux, offset++);
> + value = tegra_dpaux_readl(dpaux, DPAUX_DP_AUXDATA_READ(i));
>
> for (j = 0; j < num; j++)
> - buffer[i + j] = value >> (j * 8);
> + buffer[i * 4 + j] = value >> (j * 8);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.4.5
>
>
This fixes the issue that I reported earlier, so feel free to add my
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev at gentoo.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150720/be4f8a7b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list