drm/amdkfd: bad CONFIG_ prefix for enum entries

[Valentin Rothberg]

Hi Christian,

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
> On 04.06.2015 17:09, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Valentin Rothberg
>> <valentinrothberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Valentin,
>>>>> Thanks for catching that.
>>>>> I would be grateful if you could fix this yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Please try and keep CONFIG in the name since this range of registers
>>>> are called CONFIG registers.
>>>
>>> I cannot force changing those symbols, but point out that it's
>>> violating naming conventions.  I would suggest to s/CONFIG_/CONF_/ to
>>> make clear that it's config registers.  Would you be fine with that?
>>
>> What about something like AMD_CONFIG_REG?
>
>
> For the background: The register headers will be auto generated in the
> future and if the hardware designer named the register CONFIG_* the name
> will show up in our headers as such.
>
> Prefixing it with AMD_ sounds like a good solution to me, too.

Okay.  I will prepare and send a patch tomorrow.

Kind regards,
 Valentin

> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>
>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>   Valentin
>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>> Oded
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM Valentin Rothberg
>>>>> <valentinrothberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Yair,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> your commit fbeb661bfa89 ("drm/amdkfd: Add skeleton H/W debugger
>>>>>> module support") has shown up in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>>>>>> next-20150604).  The commit adds the following lines of code to
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_dbgdev.h:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* CONFIG reg space definition */
>>>>>> +enum {
>>>>>> +       CONFIG_REG_BASE = 0x2000,       /* in dwords */
>>>>>> +       CONFIG_REG_END = 0x2B00,
>>>>>> +       CONFIG_REG_SIZE = CONFIG_REG_END - CONFIG_REG_BASE
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a problem with the 'CONFIG_' prefix of those entries.  This
>>>>>> prefix is reserved for Kconfig options in Make/Kbuild and CPP syntax,
>>>>>> so that static analysis tools (and readers of the code) may mistakenly
>>>>>> assume that the symbol is defined somewhere in a Kconfig file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I detected the issue with ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py.  Would you
>>>>>> mind renaming those entries to something without the 'CONFIG_' prefix?
>>>>>>   I can also take care of it if you wish to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>   Valentin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
>


On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
> On 04.06.2015 17:09, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Valentin Rothberg
>> <valentinrothberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Valentin,
>>>>> Thanks for catching that.
>>>>> I would be grateful if you could fix this yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Please try and keep CONFIG in the name since this range of registers
>>>> are called CONFIG registers.
>>>
>>> I cannot force changing those symbols, but point out that it's
>>> violating naming conventions.  I would suggest to s/CONFIG_/CONF_/ to
>>> make clear that it's config registers.  Would you be fine with that?
>>
>> What about something like AMD_CONFIG_REG?
>
>
> For the background: The register headers will be auto generated in the
> future and if the hardware designer named the register CONFIG_* the name
> will show up in our headers as such.
>
> Prefixing it with AMD_ sounds like a good solution to me, too.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>
>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>   Valentin
>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>> Oded
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM Valentin Rothberg
>>>>> <valentinrothberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Yair,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> your commit fbeb661bfa89 ("drm/amdkfd: Add skeleton H/W debugger
>>>>>> module support") has shown up in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>>>>>> next-20150604).  The commit adds the following lines of code to
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_dbgdev.h:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* CONFIG reg space definition */
>>>>>> +enum {
>>>>>> +       CONFIG_REG_BASE = 0x2000,       /* in dwords */
>>>>>> +       CONFIG_REG_END = 0x2B00,
>>>>>> +       CONFIG_REG_SIZE = CONFIG_REG_END - CONFIG_REG_BASE
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a problem with the 'CONFIG_' prefix of those entries.  This
>>>>>> prefix is reserved for Kconfig options in Make/Kbuild and CPP syntax,
>>>>>> so that static analysis tools (and readers of the code) may mistakenly
>>>>>> assume that the symbol is defined somewhere in a Kconfig file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I detected the issue with ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py.  Would you
>>>>>> mind renaming those entries to something without the 'CONFIG_' prefix?
>>>>>>   I can also take care of it if you wish to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>   Valentin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
>