[PATCH v6 15/15] ARM: dts: rename the clock of MIPI DSI 'pll_clk' to 'sclk_mipi'

[Inki Dae]

On 2015년 06월 22일 20:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com>:
>> + Krzysztof
>>
>> On 2015년 06월 22일 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> On 2015년 06월 12일 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>>>> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
>>>> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
>>>
>>> Mr. Kukjin and Krzysztof, can you give me Acked-by or Singed-off-by? I'd
>>> like to merge this patch to mainline through drm-next.
> 
> Dear Hyungwon Hwang,
> 
> Please always CC samsung-soc mailing list on such patches. I won't
> receive it on my personal email if you don't CC the list. The
> get_maintainers.pl gives necessary addresses.
> 
> Comment below,
> 
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Inki Dae
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang at samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes before:
>>>> - Refer https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6191811
>>>> Changes for v6:
>>>> - None
>>>>
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi
>>>> index e20cdc2..1538d7a 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi
>>>> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
>>>>              phys = <&mipi_phy 1>;
>>>>              phy-names = "dsim";
>>>>              clocks = <&clock CLK_DSIM0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_MIPI0>;
>>>> -            clock-names = "bus_clk", "pll_clk";
>>>> +            clock-names = "bus_clk", "sclk_mipi";
> 
> It seems wrong. The driver fetches reference from a name of "pll_clk",
> not "sclk_mipi". Also bindings documentation mentions pll_clk and
> bus_clk only.

Krzysztof,

There is your missing point. The driver is already considered for
pll_clk also. See the below codes,

#define OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME "pll_clk"
...

	for (i = 0; i < dsi->driver_data->num_clks; i++) {
		dsi->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(dev, clk_names[i]);
		if (IS_ERR(dsi->clks[i])) {
			if (strcmp(clk_names[i], "sclk_mipi") == 0) {
				strcpy(clk_names[i], OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME);
				i--;
				continue;
			}

			dev_info(dev, "failed to get the clock: %s\n",
					clk_names[i]);
			return PTR_ERR(dsi->clks[i]);
		}
	}

Above codes make the driver to try to get the pll_clk - defined as
OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME macro - again if getting sclk_mipi clock failed
so there is no problem even though a little bit ugly.

As you know, we should guarantee the backward compatibility so this
codes check two clock names.

Thanks,
Inki Dae

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
>>>>              status = "disabled";
>>>>              #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>              #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>