[PATCH v6 15/15] ARM: dts: rename the clock of MIPI DSI 'pll_clk' to 'sclk_mipi'
k.kozlowski at samsung.com
Mon Jun 22 21:00:14 PDT 2015
On 23.06.2015 11:28, Inki Dae wrote:
> On 2015년 06월 23일 11:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-06-22 21:35 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>:
>>> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com>:
>>>> + Krzysztof
>>>> On 2015년 06월 22일 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>>> On 2015년 06월 12일 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>>>>>> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
>>>>>> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
>>>>> Mr. Kukjin and Krzysztof, can you give me Acked-by or Singed-off-by? I'd
>>>>> like to merge this patch to mainline through drm-next.
>>> Thanks for forwarding me other necessary patch. All that burden could
>>> be easily avoided by sending everything to samsung-soc anyway.
>>> The patch itself looks good:
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>
>>> Best regards,
>> To clarify. There were seven versions of this patch and none of them
>> were sent to samsung-soc list, to Kukjin Kim or to me.
>> I also wonder about patch 2: "of: add helper for getting endpoint node
>> with specific identifiers"
>> for which I can't find respective ack from Rob Herring (+Cc). I only found this:
>> but there are only comments, not an ack.
> Below is the comments from Rob Herring. How about subscribing device
> tree mainling list? You are a maintainer of Exynos SoC. This patch was
> posted to device tree mailing list ccing Grant and Rob. If you listen to
> only Samsung SoC mailing list then you couldn't find this patch in your
> email box.
Some time ago I was subscribing devicetree, but as I am not device tree
maintainer and the traffic there is really huge, I unsubscribed.
> "On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Hyungwon Hwang
> <human.hwang at samsung.com> wrote:
> > When there are multiple ports or multiple endpoints in a port, they
> have to be
> > distinguished by the value of reg property. It is common. The drivers
> can get
> > the specific endpoint in the specific port via this function. Now the
> > have to implement this code in themselves or have to force the order
> of dt nodes
> > to get the right node.
> > Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang at samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> I'm not applying as there is no user, so apply this patch along with a
> user of the function."
Thanks! That helped me finding it in the archives.
More information about the dri-devel