[PATCH v2 4/6] drm/exynos: dsi: add support for Exynos5433 SoC

[Hyungwon Hwang]

Dear Andrej,

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:32:10 +0100
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com> wrote:

> On 03/19/2015 02:18 AM, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> > Dear Daniel,
> > 
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:13:21 +0000
> > Daniel Stone <daniel-rLtY4a/8tF1rovVCs/uTlw at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Hyungwon,
> >>
> >> On 19 March 2015 at 01:02, Hyungwon Hwang
> >> <human.hwang-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>>> +       /*
> >>>>> +        * The input PLL clock for MIPI DSI in Exynos5433 seems
> >>>>> to be fixed
> >>>>> +        * by OSC CLK.
> >>>>> +        */
> >>>>> +       fin = 24 * MHZ;
> >>>>
> >>>> Er, is this always true on other platforms as well? Shouldn't
> >>>> this be a part of the DeviceTree description?
> >>>
> >>> I forgot to change the comment in development. Finally it is found
> >>> that all exynos mipi dsi's fin is OSC clk which is 24 MHz. So I
> >>> will remove the comment, but remain the code as it is.
> >>
> >> Fair enough. Should pll_clk be removed from the DT description
> >> then, if it's fixed to the oscillator?
> > 
> > Yes. It is redundant to represent pll_clk in DT, and it should be
> > removed.
> 
> Why do you think OSC clk determines value of pll_clk?
> pll_clk is mapped to SCLK_MIPI[01] or SCLK_DSIM0 gate with few
> dividers and muxes above. So at least in theory it can differ from
> osc clk. Additionally this gate should be enabled so you cannot just
> remove it from DT.
> 
> Regards
> Andrzej

As I found, pll clk is not SCLK_MIPI[01] but OSC CLK. SCLK_DSIM0 must
be controlled in this driver as it has been, as a gate clock of MIPI
DSI block, but not as a pll clk. SCLK_DSIM0 is not the input
clock of MIPI DPHY which provides fin in this code. So clock setting
and getting code was wrong, and must be removed.

OSC CLK is not soc-depedendant but board-dependant, even though I have
not seen any board which does not use OSC CLK by 24 MHz. It must be
parsed from board DT file, which in this case, we can use the value in
pll_clk_rate (the variable name must be renamed also).

Because ambiguous description in the technical document, I can be
wrong. Please let me know if I do not understand something. Thanks for
your comment.

Best regards,
Hyungwon Hwang

> 
> > 
> >>
> >>> Thanks for your review. I will send it again with the changes you
> >>> suggested.
> >>
> >> Thanks very much!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Hyungwon Hwang
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > devicetree" in the body of a message to
> > majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA at public.gmane.org More majordomo
> > info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
>