[PATCH 66/88] drm/amdgpu: rewording some left radeons

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue May 26 20:20:05 PDT 2015

From: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou at amd.com>

Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian K├Ânig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h       | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
index 003fa2d..66b5bd0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static inline struct amdgpu_fence *to_amdgpu_fence(struct fence *f)
 static inline void amdgpu_ring_write(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t v)
 	if (ring->count_dw <= 0)
-		DRM_ERROR("radeon: writing more dwords to the ring than expected!\n");
+		DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: writing more dwords to the ring than expected!\n");
 	ring->ring[ring->wptr++] = v;
 	ring->wptr &= ring->ptr_mask;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
index fc63855e..be4d535 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
@@ -193,13 +193,13 @@ static bool amdgpu_fence_activity(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
 	 * xchg of the current process.
 	 * More over for this to go in infinite loop there need to be
-	 * continuously new fence signaled ie radeon_fence_read needs
+	 * continuously new fence signaled ie amdgpu_fence_read needs
 	 * to return a different value each time for both the currently
 	 * polling process and the other process that xchg the last_seq
 	 * btw atomic read and xchg of the current process. And the
 	 * value the other process set as last seq must be higher than
 	 * the seq value we just read. Which means that current process
-	 * need to be interrupted after radeon_fence_read and before
+	 * need to be interrupted after amdgpu_fence_read and before
 	 * atomic xchg.
 	 * To be even more safe we count the number of time we loop and

More information about the dri-devel mailing list