[PATCH v9 15/17] drm: bridge: analogix/dp: try force hpd after plug in lookup failed

[Yakir Yang]

On 11/13/2015 07:38 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:27:21AM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 11/12/2015 07:10 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:09:15AM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
>>>> Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
>>>> failed when hpd plug in detect failed.
>>>>
>>>> This is an hardware property, so we need add a devicetree property
>>>> "analogix,need-force-hpd" to indicate this sutiation.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
>>>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk at rock-chips.com>
>>>> ---
>>> I didn't find this one in v10. Did it get dropped?
>> You are in my 'to' list, but I haven't send the whole v10 out,
>> most of them don't need update :)
> Okay, it's just gmail's inability to follow threading...
>   
>> This series should be:
>> ---- [v8 0/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v8 1/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v8 2/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v8 3/17 ...]
>>    |---- [...]
>>    |---- [v8 15/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v8 16/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v8 17/17 ...]
>>    |
>>    |---- [v9 10/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v9 15/17 ...]
>>       |---- We are here
>>    |---- [v9 09/17 ...]
>>    |---- [v10 09/17 ...]
>>       |---- Received an acked from you
>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix_dp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix_dp.txt
>>>> index 7659a7a..74f0e80 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix_dp.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix_dp.txt
>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ Required properties for dp-controller:
>>>>   		from general PHY binding: Should be "dp".
>>>>   Optional properties for dp-controller:
>>>> +	-analogix,need-force-hpd:
>>>> +		Indicate driver need force hpd when hpd detect failed, this
>>>> +		is used for some eDP screen which don't have hpd signal.
>>> This should be a generic property.
>> This property would only need in some no-hpd case, it would be dropped if
>> panel keep the hotplug signal, that's why I thought it should be optional.
> I agree it is optional. I just mean drop the analogix and put in a
> common binding doc (i.e. create a display/bridge/common.txt). Needing to
> ignore HPD is probably a common problem.

Oops, okay, I misunderstand what you mean. I thought you want me to put the
"analogix,need-force-hpd" to required property, not an optional property :)

I thought this should be a common property of connect, so the common 
document
in bridge is not very good, I should be in display/connector/, but I 
don't know what
else could I collect for that common document, would like to share more 
on this point

- Yakir

>
>> I thought if we put this a property to generic property, then we must need
>> to define it in normal device node, not sure whether it is right :)
> Sorry, I don't follow.
>
> Rob
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151113/b48d5dd2/attachment-0001.html>