[PATCH 3/4] drm/gem: cleanup prime lock issue with drm_gem_handle_create_tail
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Oct 14 23:36:05 PDT 2015
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:51:40AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>
> This patch cleans up one locking order issue with a deadlock on
> the prime lock.
>
> It avoids calling the prime delete function from drm_gem_handle_create_tail,
> and instead open codes the exit paths, it also splits the common code
> out for the exit path which can use it.
>
> This means the callee has to call the prime cleanup paths, which is fine
> since this is only the prime code and it holds the lock already.
>
> This is based on an patch/idea by Daniel Vetter, but I've cleaned it up
> and reworked it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 12d0dc7..49354d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -239,14 +239,12 @@ drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> }
>
> +/* use for deletion and failure in allocation */
> static void
> -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail(struct drm_file *filp,
> - struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +drm_gem_handle_cleanup(struct drm_file *filp,
> + struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
> -
> - if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_PRIME))
> - drm_gem_remove_prime_handles(obj, filp);
> drm_vma_node_revoke(&obj->vma_node, filp->filp);
>
> if (dev->driver->gem_close_object)
> @@ -254,6 +252,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete_tail(struct drm_file *filp,
> drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> }
>
> +static void
> +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime(struct drm_file *filp,
> + struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
> +
> + if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_PRIME))
> + drm_gem_remove_prime_handles(obj, filp);
> + drm_gem_handle_cleanup(filp, obj);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * drm_gem_handle_delete - deletes the given file-private handle
> * @filp: drm file-private structure to use for the handle look up
> @@ -291,7 +300,7 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete(struct drm_file *filp, u32 handle)
> idr_remove(&filp->object_idr, handle);
> spin_unlock(&filp->table_lock);
>
> - drm_gem_handle_delete_tail(filp, obj);
> + drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime(filp, obj);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_handle_delete);
> @@ -333,6 +342,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,
>
> WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->object_name_lock));
>
> + ret = drm_vma_node_allow(&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp);
> + if (ret) {
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev->driver->gem_open_object) {
> + ret = dev->driver->gem_open_object(obj, file_priv);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_vma;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Get the user-visible handle using idr. Preload and perform
> * allocation under our spinlock.
> @@ -347,26 +367,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,
> idr_preload_end();
> mutex_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> + drm_gem_handle_cleanup(file_priv, obj);
> return ret;
> }
> *handlep = ret;
>
> - ret = drm_vma_node_allow(&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp);
> - if (ret) {
> - drm_gem_handle_delete(file_priv, *handlep);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - if (dev->driver->gem_open_object) {
> - ret = dev->driver->gem_open_object(obj, file_priv);
> - if (ret) {
> - drm_gem_handle_delete(file_priv, *handlep);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> +out_vma:
> + drm_vma_node_revoke(&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp);
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -717,7 +728,7 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
> struct drm_file *file_priv = data;
> struct drm_gem_object *obj = ptr;
>
> - drm_gem_handle_delete_tail(file_priv, obj);
> + drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime(file_priv, obj);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> index d22ce83..88c004e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> /* drm_gem_handle_create_tail unlocks dev->object_name_lock. */
> ret = drm_gem_handle_create_tail(file_priv, obj, handle);
> + if (ret)
> + drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked(&file_priv->prime,
> + obj->dma_buf);
Why is this needed? We haven't yet added the handle the buffer lookup
table at this point. the create_handle_tail changes look good, so with
this hunk here removed the patch is
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> if (ret)
> goto out_put;
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list