[GIT PULL] On-demand device probing
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Sun Oct 25 18:12:24 PDT 2015
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 02:54:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> > There's also the understanding people had that the order things get
> > bound changes the ordering for some of the other cases (perhaps it's a
> > good idea to do that, it seems likely to be sensible?).
> But it really doesn't do that. Also making it do so doesn't help much
> in the cases where things can happen asynchronously (system
> suspend/resume, runtime PM).
Yeah, people seem to have that impression though. :(
> If, instead, there was a way to specify a functional dependency at the
> device registration time, it might be used to change the order of
> everything relevant, including probe. That should help to reduce the
> noise you're referring to.
This links back to the idea of having generic support for pre-probe
actions which is also generally useful (the ability to do things like
power on regulators for devices on enumerable buses so they can be
enumerated as standard).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151026/4485f81a/attachment.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list