[PATCH v4 09/16] drm: rockchip: add bpc and color mode setting

Yakir Yang ykk at rock-chips.com
Sat Sep 5 19:06:44 PDT 2015


Hi Thierry,

在 09/03/2015 04:38 PM, Thierry Reding 写道:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 06:02:25PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
>> 在 2015/9/2 16:34, Thierry Reding 写道:
> [...]
>>> At the very least your code must compile when applied against a recent
>>> upstream tree. I would also expect you to make sure the code works at
>>> runtime, though, contrary to build testing, not everybody will be able
>>> to verify that you've actually done so. It is ultimately your platform
>>> maintainer's (i.e. Heiko's) responsibility to ensure that because they
>>> will get to deal with user complaints if people can't run an upstream
>>> kernel on the devices.
>> Oh, first time to know this rule. So I should work on Heiko's github
>> kernel branch at the first time to start send upstream.
> It's usually not necessary to rebase on a specific platform tree. Most
> platform trees should feed into linux-next anyway, so linux-next would
> be the appropriate base in almost all cases.
>
> Note, though, that that's only true if you expect somebody else to merge
> your code. The reason is that whoever will end up applying your patches
> will likely apply to a tree that feeds into linux-next, and that way you
> both end up having roughly the same base.
>
> On the other hand if you are a maintainer yourself you should be keeping
> a branch based on the latest -rc1. That's especially important if your
> tree feeds into linux-next, because basing on linux-next will break very
> horribly that way.
>
> So for this particular case I would expect either Mark or Inki to apply
> these patches when they're ready. Their trees should be based on the
> latest -rc1. At least the Exynos DRM tree feeds into linux-next, so you
> should be fine if you use linux-next as a base.

Glad to know this, thanks,
- Yakir

>
> Mark, have you ever considered having your tree added to linux-next?
>
> I'm beginning to think that we need to make that a requirement for all
> DRM drivers so that we can resolve integration issues early on rather
> than Dave having to deal with them when he pulls code in.
>
> Thierry




More information about the dri-devel mailing list