[PATCH] [Bug 92082] Solaris fix: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared

[Emil Velikov]

Hi Evgeny,

On 26 September 2015 at 22:43, evgeny litvinenko
<evgeny.v.litvinenko at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
>> Including limits.h does seem like the right way forward. Can you send a git
>> format-patch created fix to the ML [1]?
> Output of format-patch is at the end of the email.
>
> I added '#include <limits.h>' right before '#include <dirent.h>'
> because on Debian 8 (jessie) the file dirent.h includes bits/posix1_lim.h
> which indirectly includes limits.h.
> Also bits/posix1_lim.h has the comment - 'Never include this file
> directly; use <limits.h> instead.'
>
> After the patch I built and run make check; make distcheck on Debian -
> no errors.
>
>> Additionally you should have noticed a bunch of warnings (missing
>> implementation of XXX) on non-linux platforms.
>> If you'd like to solve these but you're unsure what exactly the functions are
>> supposed to do, let me know and I can help out. You can also catch me at
>> #dri-devel (freenode), look for xexaxo.
>
> Thanks!
> Yes I'd like and will try to solve these 'missing implementation',
> I'll ask you if I have questions.
>
Glad to hear.

>
> ----------------------- Output of format-patch --------------
> From 0b491abb893d0faf1a9fe0e3052255bf5ad72592 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Evgeny Litvinenko <evgeny.v.litvinenko at gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 22:58:15 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] [Bug 92082] Solaris fix: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared
>
> ---

I have applied an identical patch from Felix, hope you don't mind.
Mostly because extracting patch fixed with comments is slightly
awkward. For the future please use git send-email or paste the
contents in your email client (check for wrapping) adding any comments
after the --- line.

Thank you
Emil