[PATCH] drm/radeon: Use rdev->gem.mutex to protect hyperz/cmask owners

[Daniel Vetter]

This removes the last depency of radeon for dev->struct_mutex!

Also the locking scheme for hyperz/cmask owners seems a bit unsound,
there's no protection in the preclose handler (and that never did hold
dev->struct_mutex while being called). So grab the same lock there,
too.

There's also all the checks in the cs checker, but since the overall
design seems to never stall for the previous owner I figured it's ok
if I leave this racy. It was racy even before I touched it after all
too.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
index 4e2780f8c417..6e92fee22bda 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
@@ -181,7 +181,9 @@ static void radeon_set_filp_rights(struct drm_device *dev,
 				   struct drm_file *applier,
 				   uint32_t *value)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->gem.mutex);
 	if (*value == 1) {
 		/* wants rights */
 		if (!*owner)
@@ -192,7 +194,7 @@ static void radeon_set_filp_rights(struct drm_device *dev,
 			*owner = NULL;
 	}
 	*value = *owner == applier ? 1 : 0;
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->gem.mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -724,10 +726,14 @@ void radeon_driver_preclose_kms(struct drm_device *dev,
 				struct drm_file *file_priv)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->gem.mutex);
 	if (rdev->hyperz_filp == file_priv)
 		rdev->hyperz_filp = NULL;
 	if (rdev->cmask_filp == file_priv)
 		rdev->cmask_filp = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->gem.mutex);
+
 	radeon_uvd_free_handles(rdev, file_priv);
 	radeon_vce_free_handles(rdev, file_priv);
 }
-- 
2.5.1