[PATCH 06/35] drm: Hide master MAP cleanup in drm_bufs.c
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Apr 26 21:17:25 UTC 2016
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:29:39PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> And again make sure it's a no-op for modern drivers, again with the
> exception of nouveau. Another case of dev->struct_mutex gone for
> modern drivers!
>
> v2: Also add a DRIVER_* check like for all other maps functions to
> really short-circuit the code. And give drm_legacy_rmmap used by the
> dev unregister code the same treatment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 10 +---------
> include/drm/drm_legacy.h | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c
> index e8a12a4fd400..5a51633da033 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c
> @@ -542,18 +542,38 @@ int drm_legacy_rmmap_locked(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_local_map *map)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_legacy_rmmap_locked);
>
> -int drm_legacy_rmmap(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_local_map *map)
> +void drm_legacy_rmmap(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_local_map *map)
> {
> - int ret;
> + if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_KMS_LEGACY_CONTEXT) &&
> + drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> + return;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> - ret = drm_legacy_rmmap_locked(dev, map);
> + drm_legacy_rmmap_locked(dev, map);
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
> - return ret;
> + return;
2 dead lines.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_legacy_rmmap);
>
> +void drm_legacy_master_rmmaps(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_master *master)
> +{
> + struct drm_map_list *r_list, *list_temp;
> +
> + if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_KMS_LEGACY_CONTEXT) &&
> + drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(r_list, list_temp, &dev->maplist, head) {
> + if (r_list->master == master) {
> + drm_legacy_rmmap_locked(dev, r_list->map);
> + r_list = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +}
Hmm, the entirety of the addmap interface is not guarded by legacy.
Would be good to say the two users mga and savage are !MODESET.
> +
> /* The rmmap ioctl appears to be unnecessary. All mappings are torn down on
> * the last close of the device, and this is necessary for cleanup when things
> * exit uncleanly. Therefore, having userland manually remove mappings seems
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index 55273f8f3acb..e1fb52d4f72c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> @@ -121,19 +121,11 @@ static void drm_master_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> {
> struct drm_master *master = container_of(kref, struct drm_master, refcount);
> struct drm_device *dev = master->minor->dev;
> - struct drm_map_list *r_list, *list_temp;
>
> if (dev->driver->master_destroy)
> dev->driver->master_destroy(dev, master);
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(r_list, list_temp, &dev->maplist, head) {
> - if (r_list->master == master) {
> - drm_legacy_rmmap_locked(dev, r_list->map);
> - r_list = NULL;
> - }
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + drm_legacy_master_rmmaps(dev, master);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->maplist));
might be useful?
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list