[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Avoid printing negative values for unsigned variables.

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:04:36PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:53:46AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > It was really strange to see negative vblank seqs on debug
> > messages. It is rare to have that big number, but when it
> > happens it is confusing and misleading.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Put into my -misc queue, will push out once -rc1 hits.
-Daniel

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > index 77f357b..01a5079 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ void drm_vblank_off(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
> >  		if (e->pipe != pipe)
> >  			continue;
> >  		DRM_DEBUG("Sending premature vblank event on disable: "
> > -			  "wanted %d, current %d\n",
> > +			  "wanted %u, current %u\n",
> >  			  e->event.sequence, seq);
> >  		list_del(&e->base.link);
> >  		drm_vblank_put(dev, pipe);
> > @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> >  
> >  	seq = drm_vblank_count_and_time(dev, pipe, &now);
> >  
> > -	DRM_DEBUG("event on vblank count %d, current %d, crtc %u\n",
> > +	DRM_DEBUG("event on vblank count %u, current %u, crtc %u\n",
> >  		  vblwait->request.sequence, seq, pipe);
> >  
> >  	trace_drm_vblank_event_queued(current->pid, pipe,
> > @@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >  		return drm_queue_vblank_event(dev, pipe, vblwait, file_priv);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	DRM_DEBUG("waiting on vblank count %d, crtc %u\n",
> > +	DRM_DEBUG("waiting on vblank count %u, crtc %u\n",
> >  		  vblwait->request.sequence, pipe);
> >  	DRM_WAIT_ON(ret, vblank->queue, 3 * HZ,
> >  		    (((drm_vblank_count(dev, pipe) -
> > @@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >  		vblwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec;
> >  		vblwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec;
> >  
> > -		DRM_DEBUG("returning %d to client\n",
> > +		DRM_DEBUG("returning %u to client\n",
> >  			  vblwait->reply.sequence);
> >  	} else {
> >  		DRM_DEBUG("vblank wait interrupted by signal\n");
> > @@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static void drm_handle_vblank_events(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
> >  		if ((seq - e->event.sequence) > (1<<23))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		DRM_DEBUG("vblank event on %d, current %d\n",
> > +		DRM_DEBUG("vblank event on %u, current %u\n",
> >  			  e->event.sequence, seq);
> >  
> >  		list_del(&e->base.link);
> > -- 
> > 2.5.5
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch