[PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

Ken Phillis Jr kphillisjr at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 23:34:02 UTC 2016


On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> tbh, most if not all arm drivers are gpl only, and due to code sharing and
> refactoring I'd say a lot of that has leaked all over drm. IANAL and all
> that, but personally I believe that the entire idea of drm being MIT is
> walking on ever thinner ice. And personally I'm not going to extend effort
> to slow this down or prevent it outright, since I think all that code
> sharing with arm folks is extremely beneficial for everyone. At least here
> on Linux.
> -Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>

I generally do not have a issue with GPLv2 license. I believe that most
developers
are under the impression that for a driver (and code) to get mainlined into
the
Linux kernel requires the code to be placed under GPLv2 only. This is just a
generalized check to make sure that there is no problem placing this code
under a more permissive license.

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:07 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> On top of that: Feel free to copy SimpleDRM in any way possible.
> Consider my original implementation public domain.
>
> Thanks
> David
>

Thank you for the quick response, and I'll make a note of this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160804/0557a7c0/attachment.html>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list