[RFC 0/2] New feature: Framebuffer processors

[Daniel Stone]

Hi,

On 22 August 2016 at 16:23, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess a lot comes down to 'how long before hw designers bolt a CP to
> the thing'..  at that point, I think you especially don't want a
> per-blit kernel interface.

Regardless of whether or not we want it, we already _have_ it, in the
form of V4L2 M2M. There are already a few IP blocks working on that, I
believe. If V4L2 <-> KMS interop is painful, well, we need to fix that
anyway ...

Cheers,
Daniel