[PATCH] drm/atomic: Don't reject reflect-only rotations

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:52:29PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:32:57PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > > The check to reject combinations of multiple rotation angles is overly
> > > restrictive and has the side-effect of also failing any rotation value
> > > which consists only of reflections.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by relaxing the check to ignore values which contain no
> > > rotation flags.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 6e0c7c3358d4 ("drm/atomic: Reject attempts to use multiple rotation angles at once")
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey at arm.com>
> > 
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c |    3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > index 362e3ea..44f4030 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > @@ -846,7 +846,8 @@ int drm_atomic_plane_set_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > >  	} else if (property == config->prop_src_h) {
> > >  		state->src_h = val;
> > >  	} else if (property == plane->rotation_property) {
> > > -		if (!is_power_of_2(val & DRM_ROTATE_MASK))
> > > +		if ((val & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) &&
> > 
> > If val & DRM_ROTATE_MASK is zero, val must be REFLECT_X | REFLECT_Y.
> 
> While we bikeshed this check: Validation like this should be somewhere
> behind ->atomic_check, since if it's only here then you can sneak invalid
> stuff in through the legacy/compat set_property ioctls.

Not if you use drm_atomic_helper_plane_set_property().

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC