[PULL] MXSFB driver

[Marek Vasut]

On 12/07/2016 08:22 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-12-06 04:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 12/06/2016 08:53 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:08:06AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>> On 2 December 2016 at 04:02, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> as asked by Daniel, I collected the MXSFB DT Acks and the driver and
>>>>> wrapped it into PR (below).
>>>>
>>>> Hi Marek
>>>>
>>>> this isn't pullable as-is as it seems to be based on -next tree or something.
>>>>
>>>> Please create pull requests based on a Linus or drm-next base,
>>>
>>> Please base on drm-next, to make sure you can (and do) use latest drm code
>>> with all the latest refactorings applied.
>>
>> Yeah, already done.
> 
> Just tried to build drm-next/mxsfb I get:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mxsfb_probe':
> core.c:(.text+0x9ce9c): undefined reference to `drm_panel_attach'
> core.c:(.text+0x9cff0): undefined reference to `drm_panel_detach'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mxsfb_panel_connector_destroy':
> core.c:(.text+0x9d614): undefined reference to `drm_panel_detach'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mxsfb_create_output':
> core.c:(.text+0x9d68c): undefined reference to `of_drm_find_panel'
> make: *** [Makefile:962: vmlinux] Error 1
> 
> I guess there is a select DRM_PANEL missing.

Aw snap, I think imx_v6_v7_defconfig selects DRM_PANEL already, so this
was never caught. Which is the path of least resistance, additional
patch or respinning the whole PR ?


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut