[PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
Michael S. Tsirkin
mst at redhat.com
Thu Dec 8 16:17:32 UTC 2016
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:38:11AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/07/16 21:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:21:47AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> Additionally, there are notable exceptions to the rule that most drivers
> >> are endian-clean, e.g. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx. I would appreciate it if it
> >> would remain possible to check such drivers with sparse without enabling
> >> endianness checks. Have you considered to change #ifdef __CHECK_ENDIAN__
> >> into e.g. #ifndef __DONT_CHECK_ENDIAN__?
> > The right thing is probably just to fix these, isn't it?
> > Until then, why not just ignore the warnings?
> Neither option is realistic. With endian-checking enabled the qla2xxx
> driver triggers so many warnings that it becomes a real challenge to
> filter the non-endian warnings out manually:
> $ for f in "" CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__; do make M=drivers/scsi/qla2xxx C=2\
> $f | &grep -c ': warning:'; done
You can always revert this patch in your tree, or whatever. It does not
look like this will get fixed otherwise.
> If you think it would be easy to fix the endian warnings triggered by
> the qla2xxx driver, you are welcome to try to fix these.
Yea, this hardware was designed by someone who thought mixing
LE and BE all over the place is a good idea.
But who said it should be easy?
Maybe this change will be enough to motivate the maintainers.
Here's a minor buglet for you as a motivator:
if (ct_rsp->header.response !=
ql_dbg(ql_dbg_disc + ql_dbg_buffer, vha, 0x2077,
"%s failed rejected request on port_id: %02x%02x%02x Compeltion status 0x%x, response 0x%x\n",
vha->d_id.b.area, vha->d_id.b.al_pa, comp_status, ct_rsp->header.response);
response is BE and isn't printed correctly.
eiter->a.max_frame_size = cpu_to_be32(eiter->a.max_frame_size);
size += 4 + 4;
ql_dbg(ql_dbg_disc, vha, 0x20bc,
"Max_Frame_Size = %x.\n", eiter->a.max_frame_size);
printed too late, it's be by that time.
Here's another suspicious line
ctio24->u.status1.flags = (atio->u.isp24.attr << 9) |
shifting attr by 9 bits gives different results on BE and LE,
mixing it with le16 looks rather strange.
(mid_init_cb->init_cb.firmware_options_1 & BIT_7) != 0;
BIT_7 is native endian, firmware_options_1 is LE I think.
Look at qla27xx_find_valid_image as well.
if (pri_image_status.signature != QLA27XX_IMG_STATUS_SIGN)
qla27xx_image_status seems to be data coming from flash, but is
somehow native-endian? Maybe ...
lun = a->u.isp24.fcp_cmnd.lun;
I think lun here is in hardware format (le?), code treats it
Not to speak about interface abuse all over the place.
How about this:
qla24xx_read_flash_data(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, uint32_t *dwptr, uint32_t
struct qla_hw_data *ha = vha->hw;
/* Dword reads to flash. */
for (i = 0; i < dwords; i++, faddr++)
dwptr[i] = cpu_to_le32(qla24xx_read_flash_dword(ha,
OK so we convert to LE ...
qla24xx_read_flash_data(vha, dcode, faddr, 4);
risc_addr = be32_to_cpu(dcode);
*srisc_addr = *srisc_addr == 0 ? risc_addr : *srisc_addr;
risc_size = be32_to_cpu(dcode);
then happily assume it's BE.
And again, coming from flash, it's unlikely to actually be in the native
endian-ness as callers seem to assume. I'm guessing it's all BE.
I poked at it a bit and was able to cut down # of warnings
from 1700 to 1400 in an hour. Someone familiar with the code
should look at it.
More information about the dri-devel