[PATCH 1/2] drm: exynos: Perform initialization/cleanup at probe/remove time

Sean Paul seanpaul at chromium.org
Tue Dec 13 21:32:30 UTC 2016


On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 Dec 2016 22:10:58 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:34:05PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>> >
>> > The drm driver .load() operation is prone to race conditions as it
>> > initializes the driver after registering the device nodes. Its usage is
>> > deprecated, inline it in the probe function and call drm_dev_alloc() and
>> > drm_dev_register() explicitly.
>> >
>> > For consistency inline the .unload() handler in the remove function as
>> > well.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c       |   1 -
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c  |   1 -
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c  | 245 ++++++++++++++------------
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c  |   1 -
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c |   1 -
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c     |   1 -
>> >  6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
>
> [snip]
>
>> >  static void exynos_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
>> >  {
>> > -   drm_put_dev(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
>> > +   struct drm_device *drm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> > +
>> > +   drm_dev_unregister(drm);
>> > +
>> > +   exynos_drm_device_subdrv_remove(drm);
>> > +
>> > +   exynos_drm_fbdev_fini(drm);
>> > +   drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm);
>>
>> Unbind order is inverted from the error paths in the probe function, but
>> meh, preexisting.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>o
>>
>> ... because I really want to see drm_platform.c gone! Feel free to push to
>> drm-misc, you haz commit rights after all ;-)
>
> Let's try to get the patch tested first :-) Is exynosdrm merged through drm-
> misc ?
>

Since 2/2 should go through misc, it makes sense to take the whole
series through there (instead of lockstepping with exynos tree)

Sean

>> > +
>> > +   component_unbind_all(drm->dev, drm);
>> > +   drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm);
>> > +   drm_release_iommu_mapping(drm);
>> > +
>> > +   kfree(drm->dev_private);
>> > +   drm->dev_private = NULL;
>> > +
>> > +   drm_dev_unref(drm);
>> >  }
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


More information about the dri-devel mailing list