[RESEND][PATCH] libkms/exynos: fix memory leak in error path
Eric Engestrom
eric.engestrom at imgtec.com
Wed Dec 14 13:12:22 UTC 2016
On Wednesday, 2016-12-14 12:21:55 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 14 December 2016 at 12:07, Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at imgtec.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2016-12-14 17:16:30 +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> >> This patch fixes memory leak in error path of exynos_bo_create().
> >
> > Indeed, thanks!
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at imgtec.com>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim at samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> libkms/exynos.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libkms/exynos.c b/libkms/exynos.c
> >> index 5de2e5a..0e97fb5 100644
> >> --- a/libkms/exynos.c
> >> +++ b/libkms/exynos.c
> >> @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ exynos_bo_create(struct kms_driver *kms,
> >> pitch = (pitch + 512 - 1) & ~(512 - 1);
> >> size = pitch * ((height + 4 - 1) & ~(4 - 1));
> >> } else {
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >> + goto err_free;
> >> }
> >>
> >> memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
> >> --
> >> 1.7.4.1
> >>
> >
> > However, I feel like a cleaner fix might be to simply move the
> > allocation to where it's used and remove the now-unnecessary
> > error path, ie.:
> >
> > ----8<----
> > diff --git a/libkms/exynos.c b/libkms/exynos.c
> > index 5de2e5a..e2c1c9f 100644
> > --- a/libkms/exynos.c
> > +++ b/libkms/exynos.c
> > @@ -76,10 +76,6 @@ exynos_bo_create(struct kms_driver *kms,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - bo = calloc(1, sizeof(*bo));
> > - if (!bo)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > if (type == KMS_BO_TYPE_CURSOR_64X64_A8R8G8B8) {
> > pitch = 64 * 4;
> > size = 64 * 64 * 4;
> > @@ -96,7 +92,11 @@ exynos_bo_create(struct kms_driver *kms,
> >
> > ret = drmCommandWriteRead(kms->fd, DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_CREATE, &arg, sizeof(arg));
> > if (ret)
> > - goto err_free;
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + bo = calloc(1, sizeof(*bo));
> > + if (!bo)
> Here we're missing the drmIoctl(... DRM_IOCTL_GEM_CLOSE ...)
You're right... I'm not actually improving anything with my suggestion.
>
> Another solution is to move size/pitch calculation before the calloc.
> Not sure which one will be better though.
Let's just land Seung-Woo's fix?
We can always refactor later :)
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list