[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/atomic: Delete wrong comment.

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> drm_atomic_state_put is called unconditionally, so TEST_ONLY is no
> different from commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>

I think it'd be good to update the kerneldoc for the atomic_commit
callback to mention that drivers should grab their own references using
drm_atomic_state_get() when they need it.

Applied this one meanwhile, thanks.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 60697482b94c..d1d252261bf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -2195,10 +2195,6 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Unlike commit, check_only does not clean up state.
> -		 * Below we call drm_atomic_state_put for it.
> -		 */
>  		ret = drm_atomic_check_only(state);
>  	} else if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK) {
>  		ret = drm_atomic_nonblocking_commit(state);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch