[PATCH] drm/mm: Some doc polish

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 05:37:26PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 05:57:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > @@ -230,23 +272,23 @@ static inline u64 drm_mm_hole_node_end(const struct drm_mm_node *hole_node)
> >  
> >  /**
> >   * drm_mm_for_each_node - iterator to walk over all allocated nodes
> > - * @entry: drm_mm_node structure to assign to in each iteration step
> > - * @mm: drm_mm allocator to walk
> > + * @entry: &drm_mm_node structure to assign to in each iteration step
> 
> If we have the &struct link, do we need to say "structure"?
> We use a mix of "&struct structure" and plain "&struct". Choose a style
> and make it consistent. (Bonus points for an easy to find style guide.)

There's also "struct &struct_name" and "&struct struct_name". Anything
goes really, and I just semi-randomly pick what reads reasonably well. The
issue with macros is that they don't have the types in the declaration
(compared to functions), that's why I added the &.

And I think indicating the text that it's a structure makes some sense,
since the link could also be to an enum.

Anyway if you insist I can do some ocd for drm_mm, but for all of the drm
docs is a bit much.

Oh and the style guides we have:
https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/doc-guide/sphinx.html#writing-documentation
https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/gpu/introduction.html#style-guidelines

Reminds me, should add a link from the drm guidelines to the overall ones.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch