[PATCH 2/2] drm: make unplugged flag specific to udl driver
David Herrmann
dh.herrmann at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 20:52:09 UTC 2016
Hi
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Haixia Shi <hshi at chromium.org> wrote:
> Regarding the following comment:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
>> index 1ea8790..b4332d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
>> @@ -497,8 +497,6 @@ int drm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file
>> *filp)
>>
>> if (!--dev->open_count) {
>> retcode = drm_lastclose(dev);
>> - if (drm_device_is_unplugged(dev))
>> - drm_put_dev(dev);
>
>>Again, you cannot drop this without replacement! In this case, you
>>really should wrap fops.release() from UDL and call into drm_release()
>>before copying this unplug-logic.
>
> Does this really work? drm_release() will release minor at the end,
> regardless of dev->open_count.
"open_count" is about "drm_device". "drm_minor" is completely unrelated to this.
> If minor is released, can I still safely get dev and call drm_put_dev(dev)
> afterwards?
Of course!
David
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list