[PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu: Add comment to describe the purpose of one difficult if statement

[Alex Deucher]

From: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie at amd.com>

Use == instead of != in the if statement to make code easier understood

Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 22fa4f8..0c17348 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -780,8 +780,13 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 		next_pe_start = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(pt);
 		next_pe_start += (addr & mask) * 8;
 
-		if (cur_pe_end != next_pe_start) {
-
+		if (cur_pe_end == next_pe_start) {
+			/* The next ptb is consecutive to current ptb.
+			 * Don't call amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes now.
+			 * Will update two ptbs together in future.
+			*/
+			cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
+		} else {
 			amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes(adev, vm_update_params,
 					    cur_pe_start, cur_pe_end,
 					    cur_dst, flags);
@@ -789,8 +794,6 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 			cur_pe_start = next_pe_start;
 			cur_pe_end = next_pe_start + 8 * nptes;
 			cur_dst = dst;
-		} else {
-			cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
 		}
 
 		addr += nptes;
-- 
2.5.5