[PATCH 26/27] drm/crtc-helper: disable_unused_functions really isn't for atomic

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Jun 21 09:46:38 UTC 2016


On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:12:54PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Thursday 09 Jun 2016 10:26:44 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:36:30AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 08 Jun 2016 14:19:18 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> Rockchip just blew up here on testing, because I removed some "is this
> > >> crtc already disabled/enabled" state tracking from callbacks (not needed
> > >> with atomic). Turns out that was needed to work around rockchip still
> > >> calling legacy helper code.
> > >> 
> > >> Since me explaining on irc/mailing-list plus kerneldoc isn't enough,
> > >> be more verbose and add dmesg output. Not that anyone actually reads
> > >> that,
> > >> either.
> > > 
> > > How about also removing it from atomic drivers then ? At least omapdrm
> > > calls this function.
> > 
> > I tried, and thought I caught them all. See preceeding sti patch. Not sure
> > why I missed it, will remedy.
> 
> With the call removed from drivers,
> 
> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

Applied to drm-misc, thanks for double-checking.
-Daniel

> 
> > >> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > >> ---
> > >> 
> > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 3 +++
> > >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >> 
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c index a6e42433ef0e..b47ec24939a0
> > >> 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> > >> @@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ static void
> > >> __drm_helper_disable_unused_functions(struct drm_device *dev) */
> > >> 
> > >>  void drm_helper_disable_unused_functions(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >>  {
> > >> +	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_ATOMIC))
> > >> +		DRM_ERROR("Called for atomic driver, this is not what you
> > >> want.\n");
> > >> +
> > >>  	drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> > >>  	__drm_helper_disable_unused_functions(dev);
> > >>  	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list