Alternative binding proposal for tda998x audio (Was: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 4/8] drm/i2c: tda998x: Add support of a DT graph of ports)

[Jean-Francois Moine]

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:51:09 +0200
Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> wrote:

> I know that it works, I have used it myself until now, but it is not 
> needed and there is no driver that parses audio port endpoints. I see no 
> point specifying something in the binding that is not used and there no 
> specific plan to ever use it.
> 
> AFAIU my proposed binding should work equally well with simple-card, 
> with or without multi-codec support.

As told many times, the simple card is a pure Linux specific entity.
It does not describe any hardware. It should not appear in a DT, or,
if it does, its compatible should be "linux, simple-audio-card".
Then, how can the other OSs know the links between the audio
devices and the audio encoders/connectors?

On the other way, the audio graph does not impose any particular
software design. It just describes the links between the different
hardware components and each OS is free to implement its own layout.

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/