[PATCH] drm/radeon: refactor CIK tiling table initialization
Deucher, Alexander
Alexander.Deucher at amd.com
Mon Mar 7 23:45:36 UTC 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Poimboeuf [mailto:jpoimboe at redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 6:10 PM
> To: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; kbuild
> test robot; Ingo Molnar
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: refactor CIK tiling table initialization
>
> When compiling the radeon driver on x86_64 with
> CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
> enabled, objtool gives the following warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.o: warning: objtool:
> cik_tiling_mode_table_init()+0x6ce: call without frame pointer save/setup
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.o: warning: objtool:
> cik_tiling_mode_table_init()+0x72b: call without frame pointer save/setup
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.o: warning: objtool:
> cik_tiling_mode_table_init()+0x464: call without frame pointer save/setup
> ...
>
> These are actually false positive warnings; there are no frame pointer
> bugs. Instead objtool gets confused by the jump tables created by all
> the switch statements, combined with some other gcc optimizations. It
> tries to follows all possible code paths, but it fails to realize that
> some of the paths aren't possible. For example:
>
> 4c97: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
> ...
> 4ca2: 89 c1 mov %eax,%ecx
> 4ca4: ff 24 cd 00 00 00 00 jmpq *0x0(,%rcx,8) 4ca7: R_X86_64_32S
> .rodata+0x148
>
> First eax is cleared to zero with the "xor %eax,%eax" instruction.
> Later, it moves the value of eax (zero in this case) to ecx, and uses
> that value to jump to the first entry in a jump table in .rodata.
>
> Because objtool doesn't have an x86 emulator, it doesn't know that rcx
> is zero. So instead of following a single code path to the first jump
> table entry, it follows all possible jump table entry paths in parallel.
>
> Usually such overactive analysis isn't a problem. In every other jump
> table in the kernel, all the jump targets have the same frame pointer
> state. But in this exceedingly rare case, different targets have
> different frame pointer states. Objtool notices that and creates the
> false positive warnings.
>
> In theory we could use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD marker to tell
> objtool to skip analysis of the function. However, that's less than
> ideal.
>
> Looking at the cik_tiling_mode_table_init() code, it seems overly
> complex with lots of repetition. So let's simplify it. All the switch
> statements and conditionals can be replaced with much simpler logic by
> generalizing the different behaviors and moving the initialization data
> into data structures.
>
> The change is a win-win: it's easier to parse for both humans and
> machines. It also reduces the binary size by about 2%:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 101011 30360 0 131371 2012b cik-before.o
> 98699 30200 0 128899 1f783 cik-after.o
>
> [ Note: Unfortunately I don't know how to test this code, so it's
> completely untested. Any help or guidance with ensuring that the
> correct initialization is still being written would be greatly
> appreciated! ]
I think it would be clearer to rework it similarly to how it was reworked in amdgpu (see gfx_v8_0.c and gfx_v7_0.c in drm-next). Also ideally you'd update the similar code in si.c as well for consistency.
Alex
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list