[PATCH RFC 00/11] drm/tilcdc: Atomic modeset support

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue May 10 22:31:54 UTC 2016


On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Noralf Trønnes <noralf at tronnes.org> wrote:
>> Hm, my idea with external transcoders was to pull them in as a
>> drm_bridge. That's of course more work, and we already have a
>> proliferation of different transcoder driver standards in drm
>> unfortunately (there's drm_bridge, but als to drm_encoder_slave).
>
>
> Does this mean that you want the drm_bridge_*() functions in
> disable_outputs(), crtc_set_mode() and
> drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables() to run for
> drm_simple_display_pipe?
>
> Because "drm: Make drm_encoder_helper_funcs optional" skips those bridge
> functions if encoder->helper_private is not set (I found this pattern in
> mode_fixup() which skips drm_bridge_mode_fixup() on !funcs).
> So if that's the case, I have to add an empty drm_encoder_helper_funcs to
> the
> simple pipe.

Oops you're right. I think the correct fix would be to always run the
bridge functions though, there's really no need to break that when
there's no encoder vtable. Since I merged your initial patch already,
care to create a follow-up patch to rectify this?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list