[PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm: Add and handle new aspect ratios in DRM layer"

Sharma, Shashank shashank.sharma at intel.com
Thu Nov 3 16:19:37 UTC 2016



On 11/3/2016 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> If you still think you should send this revert, I am removing my NACK.
>>> Pls Go ahead.
>> The other option is to not revert and instead slap a fix on top. But
>> that would have to be done reasonably quickly so that the thing is
>> ready in time for 4.10. We're closing in on 4.9-rc4 now so I guess
>> we should still have a few weeks to fix things up. Whether that's
>> enough I don't know. If not, then we should revert.
> 1 week and then revert is the guideline. Please don't bend the rules
> for regressions all the time, it makes things painful for everyone
> else.
> -Daniel
I don't remember breaking it for first time itself.
As I mentioned in the other thread, please add the regression details.
After that, revert it if you want (I saw you have already given 
maintainers-ack)

Regards
Shashank



More information about the dri-devel mailing list