[PATCH libdrm 3/5] xf86drm: implement drmParsePciDeviceInfo for OpenBSD
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 16:11:28 UTC 2016
On 30 November 2016 at 00:38, Jonathan Gray <jsg at jsg.id.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 07:55:13PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 26 November 2016 at 00:40, Jonathan Gray <jsg at jsg.id.au> wrote:
>> > Implement drmParsePciDeviceInfo for OpenBSD by using the new
>> > DRM_IOCTL_GET_PCIINFO ioctl.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg at jsg.id.au>
>> > ---
>> > xf86drm.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c
>> > index b355c83..581527b 100644
>> > --- a/xf86drm.c
>> > +++ b/xf86drm.c
>> > @@ -102,6 +102,26 @@
>> > #define DRM_MAJOR 226 /* Linux */
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +#ifdef __OpenBSD__
>> > +
>> > +#define X_PRIVSEP
>> > +
>> > +struct drm_pciinfo {
>> > + uint16_t domain;
>> > + uint8_t bus;
>> > + uint8_t dev;
>> > + uint8_t func;
>> > + uint16_t vendor_id;
>> > + uint16_t device_id;
>> > + uint16_t subvendor_id;
>> > + uint16_t subdevice_id;
>> > + uint8_t revision_id;
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +#define DRM_IOCTL_GET_PCIINFO DRM_IOR(0x15, struct drm_pciinfo)
>> > +
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > #define DRM_MSG_VERBOSITY 3
>> >
>> > #define memclear(s) memset(&s, 0, sizeof(s))
>> > @@ -2991,6 +3011,37 @@ static int drmParsePciDeviceInfo(const char *d_name,
>> > device->subdevice_id = config[46] | (config[47] << 8);
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> > +#elif defined(__OpenBSD__)
>> > + struct drm_pciinfo pinfo;
>> > + char buf[PATH_MAX + 1];
>> > + int fd, n;
>> > +
>> > + n = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/%s", DRM_DIR_NAME, d_name);
>> > + if (n == -1 || n >= sizeof(buf))
>> > + return -errno;
>> > +
>> > +#ifndef X_PRIVSEP
>> > + fd = open(buf, O_RDWR, 0);
>> > +#else
>> > + fd = priv_open_device(buf);
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> Since X_PRIVSEP is always set one can drop the ifndef case alongside
>> the define X_PRIVSEP all together. At the same time, priv_open_device
>> isn't defined thus one might well use drmOpenMinor() like in 4/5 ?
>
> Then we'd have to find a minor number and type based on the d_name
> string argument to drmParsePciDeviceInfo. The priv_open_device part is
> really a different patch.
>
>>
>> Sidenote: In the future we might fold drmParsePciBusInfo and
>> drmParsePciDeviceInfo, but for the moment we have to keep them
>> separate :-(
>
> Annoying that one takes a minor and one takes a string...
It's a po-tay-to po-tah-to case on our end :-) A maj/min pair seems
better, patch coming in a bit.
Thanks
Emil
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list