[PATCH v10 0/3] Secure Memory Allocation Framework

Wed Oct 5 13:19:59 UTC 2016

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:47:21PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> version 10 changes:
>  - rebased on kernel 4.8 tag
>  - minor typo fix
> 
> version 9 changes:
>  - rebased on 4.8-rc5
>  - struct dma_attrs doesn't exist anymore so update CMA allocator
>    to compile with new dma_*_attr functions
>  - add example SMAF use case in cover letter
> 
> version 8 changes:
>  - rework of the structures used within ioctl
>    by adding a version field and padding to be futur proof
>  - rename fake secure moduel to test secure module
>  - fix the various remarks done on the previous patcheset
> 
> version 7 changes:
>  - rebased on kernel 4.6-rc7
>  - simplify secure module API
>  - add vma ops to be able to detect mmap/munmap calls
>  - add ioctl to get number and allocator names
>  - update libsmaf with adding tests
>    https://git.linaro.org/people/benjamin.gaignard/libsmaf.git
>  - add debug log in fake secure module
> 
> version 6 changes:
>  - rebased on kernel 4.5-rc4
>  - fix mmapping bug while requested allocation size isn't a a multiple of
>    PAGE_SIZE (add a test for this in libsmaf)
> 
> version 5 changes:
>  - rebased on kernel 4.3-rc6
>  - rework locking schema and make handle status use an atomic_t
>  - add a fake secure module to allow performing tests without trusted
>    environment
> 
> version 4 changes:
>  - rebased on kernel 4.3-rc3
>  - fix missing EXPORT_SYMBOL for smaf_create_handle()
> 
> version 3 changes:
>  - Remove ioctl for allocator selection instead provide the name of
>    the targeted allocator with allocation request.
>    Selecting allocator from userland isn't the prefered way of working
>    but is needed when the first user of the buffer is a software component.
>  - Fix issues in case of error while creating smaf handle.
>  - Fix module license.
>  - Update libsmaf and tests to care of the SMAF API evolution
>    https://git.linaro.org/people/benjamin.gaignard/libsmaf.git
> 
> version 2 changes:
>  - Add one ioctl to allow allocator selection from userspace.
>    This is required for the uses case where the first user of
>    the buffer is a software IP which can't perform dma_buf attachement.
>  - Add name and ranking to allocator structure to be able to sort them.
>  - Create a tiny library to test SMAF:
>    https://git.linaro.org/people/benjamin.gaignard/libsmaf.git
>  - Fix one issue when try to secure buffer without secure module registered
> 
> SMAF aim to solve two problems: allocating memory that fit with hardware IPs
> constraints and secure those data from bus point of view.
> 
> One example of SMAF usage is camera preview: on SoC you may use either an USB
> webcam or the built-in camera interface and the frames could be send directly
> to the dipslay Ip or handle by GPU.
> Most of USB interfaces and GPU have mmu but almost all built-in camera
> interace and display Ips don't have mmu so when selecting how allocate
> buffer you need to be aware of each devices constraints (contiguous memroy,
> stride, boundary, alignment ...).
> ION has solve this problem by let userland decide which allocator (heap) to use
> but this require to adapt userland for each platform and sometime for each
> use case.
> 
> To be sure to select the best allocation method for devices SMAF implement
> deferred allocation mechanism: memory allocation is only done when the first
> device effectively required it.
> Allocator modules have to implement a match() to let SMAF know if they are
> compatibles with devices needs.
> This patch set provide an example of allocator module which use
> dma_{alloc/free/mmap}_attrs() and check if at least one device have
> coherent_dma_mask set to DMA_BIT_MASK(32) in match function.
> 
> In the same camera preview use case, SMAF allow to protect the data from being
> read by unauthorized IPs (i.e. a malware to dump camera stream).
> Until now I have only see access rights protection at process/thread level 
> (PKeys/MPK) or on file (SELinux) but nothing allow to drive data bus firewalls.
> SMAF propose an interface to control and implement those firewalls.
> Like IOMMU, firewalls IPs can help to protect memory from malicious/faulty devices
> that are attempting DMA attacks.
> 
> Secure modules are responsibles of granting and revoking devices access rights
> on the memory. Secure module is also called to check if CPU map memory into
> kernel and user address spaces.
> An example of secure module implementation can be found here:
> http://git.linaro.org/people/benjamin.gaignard/optee-sdp.git
> This code isn't yet part of the patch set because it depends on generic TEE
> which is still under discussion (https://lwn.net/Articles/644646/)
> 
> For allocation part of SMAF code I get inspirated by Sumit Semwal work about
> constraint aware allocator.

semi-random review comment, and a bit late: Why not implement smaf as a
new heap in ion? I think consensus is pretty much that we'll be stuck with
ion forever, and I think it's better to have 1 central buffer allocater
than lots of them ...
-Daniel

> 
> Benjamin Gaignard (3):
>   create SMAF module
>   SMAF: add CMA allocator
>   SMAF: add test secure module
> 
>  drivers/Kconfig                |   2 +
>  drivers/Makefile               |   1 +
>  drivers/smaf/Kconfig           |  17 +
>  drivers/smaf/Makefile          |   3 +
>  drivers/smaf/smaf-cma.c        | 186 ++++++++++
>  drivers/smaf/smaf-core.c       | 818 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/smaf/smaf-testsecure.c |  90 +++++
>  include/linux/smaf-allocator.h |  45 +++
>  include/linux/smaf-secure.h    |  65 ++++
>  include/uapi/linux/smaf.h      |  85 +++++
>  10 files changed, 1312 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/smaf/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/smaf/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/smaf/smaf-cma.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/smaf/smaf-core.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/smaf/smaf-testsecure.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/smaf-allocator.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/smaf-secure.h
>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/smaf.h
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch