[PATCH] *-symbol-check: Don't hard-code nm executable

[Emil Velikov]

Hi Heiko,

On 3 October 2016 at 18:26, Heiko Becker <heirecka at exherbo.org> wrote:
> Helpful if your nm executable has a prefix based on the
> architecture, for example.
>
Thanks for the patch.

Currently one can run the tests as standalone. Personally I don't mind
if we "loose" that functionality or not, but in either case we want
some sane default is NM is not set.

The decision whether to error/skip out or use a default value, I'll
leave to you ;-)

Thanks
Emil