[PATCH v2] drm/bridge: adv7511: Remove unused code blocks

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Jitendra,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 19 Oct 2016 17:12:48 Jitendra Sharma wrote:
> Remove redundant condition check
> Remove not necessary if-else block for checking DT entry because else
> part will never be picked as in absence of device node, probe will
> fail in initial stage only.
> 
> Remove unused id->driver_data entries
> As id->driver_data is not used in driver source. So no need in
> Keeping these entries in id_table
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitendra Sharma <shajit at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Probe was not happening in Patch v1 due to removal of .id_table.As the
> intention of this patch is not to change any functionality, also
> changes looks simple enough.So, didn't verified Patch v1 over hardware

You should *ALWAYS* verify patches before sending them out.

I assume you've now properly tested this one ?

> Hence fixing the issues in Patch v1 and posting patch v2
> 
> Changes for v2:
>  - Keep the id_table entries
>  - Keep the id->driver_data to 0
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c index 8ed3906..3279059
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
> @@ -942,10 +942,7 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const
> struct i2c_device_id *id) adv7511->powered = false;
>  	adv7511->status = connector_status_disconnected;
> 
> -	if (dev->of_node)
> -		adv7511->type = (enum 
adv7511_type)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -	else
> -		adv7511->type = id->driver_data;
> +	adv7511->type = (enum adv7511_type)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> 
>  	memset(&link_config, 0, sizeof(link_config));
> 
> @@ -1066,11 +1063,11 @@ static int adv7511_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>  }
> 
>  static const struct i2c_device_id adv7511_i2c_ids[] = {
> -	{ "adv7511", ADV7511 },
> -	{ "adv7511w", ADV7511 },
> -	{ "adv7513", ADV7511 },
> +	{ "adv7511", 0 },
> +	{ "adv7511w", 0 },
> +	{ "adv7513", 0 },
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7533
> -	{ "adv7533", ADV7533 },
> +	{ "adv7533", 0 },
>  #endif

What's the purpose of this ? It doesn't save any memory or CPU cycle.

>  	{ }
>  };

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart