[PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr: mark symbols static where possible

Christian König christian.koenig at amd.com
Mon Sep 19 07:59:56 UTC 2016


Am 19.09.2016 um 09:34 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Monday, September 19, 2016 3:28:39 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:
>> We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/smumgr/tonga_smumgr.c:146:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'tonga_program_jump_on_start' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c:816:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'fiji_save_vft_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c:743:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'polaris10_avfs_event_mgr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/smumgr/iceland_smumgr.c:167:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'iceland_program_jump_on_start' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> ....
>>
>> In fact, these functions are only used in the file in which they are
>> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
>> So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org>
>>
> Hi Baoyou,
>
> All your drm/amd patches seem fine to me, but again (as with the nouveau
> driver patches before), I think it would make more sense to consolidate
> them, and do a small number of patches such as
>
> [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: add missing includes
> [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu: remove unused functions
> [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: mark symbol static where possible
>
> This is all one big driver,

No it isn't. The different parts are developed by different teams at 
AMD, so the splitting them up is rather welcome here.

So please keep your style as it is, at least for the amdgpu driver.

Regards,
Christian.

>   and I see no value in splitting it up
> per file within the driver.
>
> 	Arnd




More information about the dri-devel mailing list