[PATCH 00/14] mgag200 fixes

[Mathieu Larouche]

On 18/07/2017 10:43 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a summer cleanup sale, a patchset containing various fixes for
> mgag200 driver taken from openSUSE / SUSE kernels.  They have been in
> our kernels for ages, so at least they are supposed to be stable.
>
> Most of patches came from Egbert, and one PM patch from me that is a
> resubmission of the once-post-and-lost patch.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
> ===
>
> Egbert Eich (13):
>    drm/mgag200: Add doublescan and interlace support
>    drm/mgag200: Add additional limits for certain G200 variants
>    drm/mgag200: Fix memleak in error path in mgag200_bo_create()
>    drm/mgag200: Free container instead of member in
>      mga_user_framebuffer_destroy()
>    drm/mgag200: Initialize data needed to map fbdev memory
>    drm/mgag200: Simplify function mgag200_ttm_placement()
>    drm/mgag200: Add support for MATROX PCI device IDs 0x520 and 0x521
>    drm/mgag200: Cleanup cursor BOs properly
>    drm/mgag200: Add missing drm_connector_unregister()
>    drm/mgag200: Don't use crtc_* parameters for validation
>    drm/mgag200: Consolidate depth/bpp handling
>    drm/mgag200: Add command line option to specify preferred depth
>    drm/mgag200: Add mode validation debugging code
>
> Takashi Iwai (1):
>    drm/mgag200: Implement basic PM support
>
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.c  |  54 +++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h  |  22 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c   |  14 +--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_ttm.c  |  11 ++-
>   6 files changed, 357 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>

Patches were tested against G200eW3, G200e4 & G200eH3 and it's working 
fine and we haven't seen any issues.

There's one thing though, the patch "[PATCH 01/14] drm/mgag200: Add 
doublescan and interlace support" may cause problems as doublescan and 
interlace aren't tested and aren't officially supported on the G200 
server line products. So, I'm wondering if it shouldn't be kept disabled 
for them.

-- 
Mathieu Larouche Ing./Eng.
Software Designer
Matrox Graphics Inc.
Phone : 514 822-6000 x7905
Email : mathieu.larouche at matrox.com