[PATCH v3 01/22] drm: Add GEM backed framebuffer library

Eric Anholt eric at anholt.net
Wed Aug 16 22:48:55 UTC 2017


Noralf Trønnes <noralf at tronnes.org> writes:

> Den 16.08.2017 22.39, skrev Laurent Pinchart:
>> Hi Noralf,
>>
>> On Wednesday 16 Aug 2017 21:52:02 Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>>> Den 16.08.2017 19.24, skrev Eric Anholt:
>>>> Noralf Trønnes <noralf at tronnes.org> writes:
>>>>> This library provides helpers for drivers that don't subclass
>>>>> drm_framebuffer and are backed by drm_gem_object. The code is
>>>>> taken from drm_fb_cma_helper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf at tronnes.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * drm_gem_fb_destroy - Free GEM backed framebuffer
>>>>> + * @fb: DRM framebuffer
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Frees a GEM backed framebuffer with it's backing buffer(s) and the
>>>>> structure
>>>> grammar nit: "its"
>>>>
>>>> Other than that,
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
>>> Thanks, applied to drm-misc.
>> The patches were posted on Sunday. If you don't give at least a week to
>> reviewers, I don't think they will keep bothering. I certainly won't.
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> I actually didn't think there was much interest in this patchset since
> the first version of the patcheset was sent 31/7. Daniel gave me his rb
> if I fixed the docs a week ago. Instead of applying it directly I sent
> a new version to give Eric a chance to look at it since he showed
> interest in an rfc. So when I got his rb, I just applied.
>
> All that being said, I do appreciate reviews since that improves the work.
> I will adapt to waiting a week if that's what's expected.
>
> Sorry about the let down.

For what it's worth, I think the speed of merging was entirely
appropriate in this case.  It had been a week since the previous
version, that got no replies except for danvet's.  You're effectively
just moving code and renaming some functions, and danvet and I had both
replied positively.

As far as concerns about whether everyone gets to give their feedback
go, my stance is: The great thing about git is that you can make changes
to code even after a patch goes in.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20170816/29b0f115/attachment.sig>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list