[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines
seanpaul at chromium.org
Fri Dec 1 18:00:51 UTC 2017
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-01 17:55:15)
>> Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17)
>> > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> > > The current wait_for() is a little more complicated nowadays (variable
>> > > W).
>> > >
>> > Hmm, am I based off the wrong tree? I'm using drm-intel-next.
>> drm-intel-next is what was sent as a PR; drm-intel-next-queued is always
>> current. To be sure CI, doesn't complain about merge conflicts, base on
Ahhhh, i forgot about -queued. ok, will rebase.
> Speaking of CI, do you have any instructions on how we might set up a
> test system?
I'm working on an igt test for the property now.
> Just needs a compatible monitor and some test code?
Yep. For testing, I exposed the property via sysfs and fiddle with it that way.
> Could chamelium or something like that be used as a validator?
You would have to implement the receiver side of HDCP on chamelium in
order for this to work. So, probably not.
More information about the dri-devel