[Bug 103829] [CI] igt at gem_busy@close-race - fail - Failed assertion: gem_bo_busy(fd, object[0].handle)
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Dec 4 14:33:04 UTC 2017
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103829
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
commit 7e07894d8b0f567cb4241b5bed8a9644874ddd47 (HEAD, upstream/master)
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Dec 1 21:53:03 2017 +0000
igt/gem_busy: Replace arbitrary busy batch with indefinite spinbatch
In CI, we were observing situations where the busy blt would complete
before the very next instruction (in userspace) to assert that it was
busy. This is entirely possible if the process was scheduled away and
slept for longer than the arbitrary batch. Instead replace arbitrariness
with a precise infinity.
v2: Be respectful to UP!
v3: Move spinbatch to owning process to avoid serialisation delays.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103829
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
(Hopefully)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20171204/ff309ba3/attachment.html>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list