[PATCH] drm/i915: Use copy_from_user() in fence copying
David.Laight at ACULAB.COM
Mon Dec 11 09:41:35 UTC 2017
From: Kees Cook
> Sent: 08 December 2017 21:10
> >> There's no good reason to separate the access_ok() from the copy,
> >> especially since the access_ok() size is hard-coded instead of using
> >> sizeof(). Instead, just use copy_from_user() directly.
> > Looks like an optimisation to save doing the access_ok() check
> > for every 'fence'.
> If it really makes a difference, okay, but access_ok() checks are fast. :P
Not compared to get_user() :-)
More information about the dri-devel