[PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: enable eviction for Per-VM-BO

Christian K├Ânig ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 10:40:17 UTC 2017


Am 12.12.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Roger He:
> Change-Id: I491d4ceb8c98bb3d8e6e0ddef2330284ce2fe5f6
> Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He at amd.com>

I would squash this one with patch #6.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index eb8c568..22b6ca5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -722,10 +722,9 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>   	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>   	for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>   		list_for_each_entry(bo, &man->lru[i], lru) {
> -			if (bo->resv == resv) {
> -				if (list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))
> -					continue;
> -			} else {
> +			if (!ctx ||
> +				!(ctx->on_alloc_stage &&
> +				bo->resv == ctx->resv)) {

Coding style: The lines stating with "!(ctx" and "bo->resv" are to far 
to the right.

Additional to that I think ctx is mandatory and doesn't need a check 
(but might be wrong). If it isn't it's probably time to make it mandatory.

And I would use (ctx->on_alloc_stage || list_empty(&bo->ddestroy)) as 
check, we probably still want to be able to handle deleted BOs here 
during CS.

Christian.

>   				locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
>   				if (!locked)
>   					continue;



More information about the dri-devel mailing list