[PATCH 2/2] drm/ast: Support AST2500

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 17:33 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> "Water is wet" type of comment. Worth mentioning why it's so large -
> mentioned in the documentation, experimental result, other ?
> Same suggestion goes for the other mdelay(100) instances.

Ah I removed most of those useless comments, I must have missed
that one. As for why 100ms, that's aspeed code. The init sequence
per-se isn't documented well, so I assume they know what they are doing
:-)

Keep in mind that this code is almost never used. It's only used
if the BMC is running no code at all, to "remotely" initialize its
memory controller.

Cheers,
Ben.