[PATCH 4/9] drm/ast: Fix calculation of MCLK

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

Some braces were missing causing an incorrect calculation.

Y.C. Chen from Aspeed provided me with the right formula
which I tested on AST2400 and 2500.

The MCLK isn't currently used by the driver (it will eventually
to filter modes) so the issue isn't catastrophic.

Also make the printed value a bit more meaningful

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
index b593a53..eb6ba3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int ast_get_dram_info(struct drm_device *dev)
 		div = 0x1;
 		break;
 	}
-	ast->mclk = ref_pll * (num + 2) / (denum + 2) * (div * 1000);
+	ast->mclk = ref_pll * (num + 2) / ((denum + 2) * (div * 1000));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -485,7 +485,9 @@ int ast_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
 		if (ret)
 			goto out_free;
 		ast->vram_size = ast_get_vram_info(dev);
-		DRM_INFO("dram %d %d %d %08x\n", ast->mclk, ast->dram_type, ast->dram_bus_width, ast->vram_size);
+		DRM_INFO("dram MCLK=%u Mhz type=%d bus_width=%d size=%08x\n",
+			 ast->mclk, ast->dram_type,
+			 ast->dram_bus_width, ast->vram_size);
 	}
 
 	if (need_post)
-- 
2.9.3