[PATCH 0/8] ARM: sun8i: a33: Mali improvements
Alexandre Belloni
alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com
Fri Feb 17 15:42:19 UTC 2017
On 17/02/2017 at 13:45:44 +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> > The device tree is a representation of the hardware itself. The state
> > of the driver support doesn't change the hardware you're running on,
> > just like your BIOS/UEFI on x86 won't change the device it reports to
> > Linux based on whether it has a driver for it.
> Like Emil already said, the new bindings and the DT entries are solely
> introduced to support a proprietary out-of-tree module.
>
Because device tree describes the hardware, the added binding doesn't
support any particular module. The eventually upstreamed drvier will
share the same bindings.
> The current workflow when introducing new DT entries is the following:
> - upstream a driver that uses the entries
> - THEN add the new entries
>
Exactly not, if you do that, checkpatch will complain loudly. Because
you must not add a driver using bindings that are not documented first.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list