[PATCH 10/10] drm/msm/dsi: Add PHY/PLL for 8x96

Stephen Boyd sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Jan 19 20:17:04 UTC 2017


On 01/07, Archit Taneja wrote:
> +
> +static struct clk *pll_14nm_postdiv_register(struct dsi_pll_14nm *pll_14nm,
> +					     const char *name,
> +					     const char *parent_name,
> +					     unsigned long flags,
> +					     u8 shift)
> +{
> +	struct dsi_pll_14nm_postdiv *pll_postdiv;
> +	struct device *dev = &pll_14nm->pdev->dev;
> +	struct clk_init_data postdiv_init = {
> +		.parent_names = (const char *[]) { parent_name },
> +		.num_parents = 1,
> +		.name = name,
> +		.flags = flags,
> +		.ops = &clk_ops_dsi_pll_14nm_postdiv,
> +	};
> +
> +	pll_postdiv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pll_postdiv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pll_postdiv)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	pll_postdiv->pll = pll_14nm;
> +	pll_postdiv->shift = shift;
> +	/* both N1 and N2 postdividers are 4 bits wide */
> +	pll_postdiv->width = 4;
> +	/* range of each divider is from 1 to 15 */
> +	pll_postdiv->flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED;
> +	pll_postdiv->hw.init = &postdiv_init;
> +
> +	return clk_register(dev, &pll_postdiv->hw);

Can you use clk_hw_register() and the variants instead? Same for
the clk_provider calls in this patch.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


More information about the dri-devel mailing list