[PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915: Acquire P-Unit access when modifying P-Unit settings
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Jan 30 15:11:44 UTC 2017
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:02:19PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30-01-17 14:10, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 06:18:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 01/28/2017 05:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 01/27/2017 02:51 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:09:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>>>> Make sure the P-Unit or the PMIC i2c bus is not in use when we send a
> >>>>> request to the P-Unit by calling iosf_mbi_punit_acquire() / _release()
> >>>>> around P-Unit write accesses.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can't we just stuff the calls into the actual punit write function
> >>>> rather than sprinkling them all over the place?
> >>>
> >>> punit access is acquired across sections like this:
> >>>
> >>> iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>
> >>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>> val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
> >>> val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT);
> >>> vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ, val);
> >>> if (wait_for((vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ) &
> >>> DSPFREQSTAT_MASK) == (cmd << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT),
> >>> 50)) {
> >>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> >>> }
> >>> iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>
> >>> Where we want to wait for the requested change to have taken
> >>> effect before releasing the punit.
> >
> > Hmm. That's somewhat unfortunate. It also highlights a problem with the
> > patch wrt. RPS. We don't wait for the GPU to actually change frequencies
> > in set_rps() because that would slow things down too much. So I have to
> > wonder how much luck is needed to make this workaround really effective.
>
> So the history of this patch-set is that I wrote this patch before
> writing the patch to get FORCEWAKE_ALL before the pmic bus becomes
> active (patch 12/13). Since a lot of testing was done with this
> patch included in the patch-set and since it seemed a good idea
> regardless (given my experience with accessing the punit vs
> pmic bus accesses) I decided to leave it in.
>
> Possibly just the patch to get FORCEWAKE_ALL is enough, that one
> actually fixed things for me. That is also why I made this the
> last patch in the set. I asked tagorereddy to test his system
> without this patch, but he did not get around to that.
>
> After all we do tell the punit to not touch the bus by acquiring
> the pmic bus semaphore from i2c-desigware-baytrail.c, so maybe
> for RPS freq changes it honors that and properly waits. Maybe it
> honors that for all punit requests i915 does and the only real
> problem is the forcewake stuff ?
>
> I can try to drop this patch from my queue and run without it
> for a while and see if things don't regress. And also ask
> tagorereddy again to test his system that way.
>
> Does that (dropping this patch for now) sound like a good idea?
More test results couldn't hurt at least. It also makes me wonder if
just bumping the timeouts to some ridiculously high value would fix
the problem as well.
>
> >>>> + a comment would be nice why it's there.
> >>>
> >>> I will add comments to the acquire calls.
> >>>
> >>>> Do we need a kconfig select/depends on the iosf_mbi thing? Or some
> >>>> ifdefs?
> >>>
> >>> No, the iosf_mbi header defines empty inline versions of
> >>> iosf_mbi_punit_acquire / _release if IOSF_MBI is disabled,
> >>> this does mean that iosf_mbi must be builtin if the i915
> >>> driver is. I'll add:
> >>>
> >>> depends on DRM_I915=IOSF_MBI || IOSF_MBI=y
> >>>
> >>> To the i915 Kconfig to enforce this.
> >>
> >> Hmm, ok so that does not work (long cyclic dependency through the
> >> selection of ACPI_VIDEO).
> >>
> >> So I've now added this instead:
> >>
> >> # iosf_mbi needs to be builtin if we are builtin
> >> select IOSF_MBI if DRM_I915=y
> >
> > That's probably not going to help anyone since i915 is usually a module.
>
> Right, that is fine, then either the IOSF_MBI symbols are available,
> or IOSF_MBI is disabled and we get the inline nops from the header.
>
> The problem scenario is DRM_I915=y and IOSF_MBI=m, which is not very
> realistic IMHO, but will get triggered by the random-config testing
> several contributors do and lead to an unresolved symbol error there.
Well, from the user POV anything with IOSF_MBI==n can be a problem.
So I'm not sure if we should allow that.
>
> Hmm, thinking about this, this hunk actually belongs in 12/13 as that
> is the first patch to use iosf_mbi functions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> >>>>> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155241
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> >>>>> Tested-by: tagorereddy <tagore.chandan at gmail.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>> -Spelling: P-Unit, PMIC
> >>>>> -Adjust for iosf_mbi_punit_lock/_unlock to _acquire/_release rename
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++++++
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>>>> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>>>> index 5604701..13e5152 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>>>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> >>>>> #include <drm/drm_rect.h>
> >>>>> #include <linux/dma_remapping.h>
> >>>>> #include <linux/reservation.h>
> >>>>> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static bool is_mmio_work(struct intel_flip_work *work)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> @@ -6421,6 +6422,8 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>>>> cmd = 0;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>>>> val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
> >>>>> val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT);
> >>>>> @@ -6430,6 +6433,7 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>>>> 50)) {
> >>>>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >>>>> @@ -6497,6 +6501,7 @@ static void cherryview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>>>> cmd = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>>>> val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV;
> >>>>> val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT_CHV);
> >>>>> @@ -6506,6 +6511,7 @@ static void cherryview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>>>> 50)) {
> >>>>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >>>>> index 249623d..adff84a 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >>>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> >>>>> #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"
> >>>>> #include <linux/module.h>
> >>>>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> >>>>> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /**
> >>>>> * DOC: RC6
> >>>>> @@ -276,6 +277,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_dvfs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>>>> u32 val;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>>
> >>>>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DDR_SETUP2);
> >>>>> if (enable)
> >>>>> @@ -290,6 +292,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_dvfs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>>>> FORCE_DDR_FREQ_REQ_ACK) == 0, 3))
> >>>>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for Punit DDR DVFS request\n");
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -298,6 +301,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_pm5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>>>> u32 val;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>>
> >>>>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>>>> if (enable)
> >>>>> @@ -306,6 +310,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_pm5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>>>> val &= ~DSP_MAXFIFO_PM5_ENABLE;
> >>>>> vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ, val);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -4553,6 +4558,7 @@ void vlv_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> >>>>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>>
> >>>>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>>>> if (val & DSP_MAXFIFO_PM5_ENABLE)
> >>>>> @@ -4582,6 +4588,7 @@ void vlv_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>>>> wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -4988,7 +4995,9 @@ static void valleyview_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> >>>>> I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq) {
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>> vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, val);
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> if (!IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> >>>>> gen6_set_rps_thresholds(dev_priv, val);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> >>>>> index c0b7e95..e66bcc8 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> >>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >>>>>
> >>>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >>>>> #include <linux/vgaarb.h>
> >>>>> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> #include "i915_drv.h"
> >>>>> #include "intel_drv.h"
> >>>>> @@ -1027,6 +1028,8 @@ static void vlv_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>>>> if (COND)
> >>>>> goto out;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> ctrl = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL);
> >>>>> ctrl &= ~mask;
> >>>>> ctrl |= state;
> >>>>> @@ -1037,6 +1040,8 @@ static void vlv_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>>>> state,
> >>>>> vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL));
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> #undef COND
> >>>>>
> >>>>> out:
> >>>>> @@ -1643,6 +1648,8 @@ static void chv_set_pipe_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>>>> if (COND)
> >>>>> goto out;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> ctrl = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>>>> ctrl &= ~DP_SSC_MASK(pipe);
> >>>>> ctrl |= enable ? DP_SSC_PWR_ON(pipe) : DP_SSC_PWR_GATE(pipe);
> >>>>> @@ -1653,6 +1660,8 @@ static void chv_set_pipe_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>>>> state,
> >>>>> vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ));
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> #undef COND
> >>>>>
> >>>>> out:
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> 2.9.3
> >>>>
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list