[PATCH 0/5] drm/atomic: Interruptible locks for everyone!
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 28 07:14:05 UTC 2017
Op 27-07-17 om 17:30 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hi Maarten
>>
>> On 27 July 2017 at 13:58, Maarten Lankhorst
>> <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> drm_atomic_commit could previous have always failed when waits failed,
>>> but locking was always done uninterruptibly. Add infrastructure to make
>>> it possible for callers to choose interruptible locking, and convert the
>>> 4 most common ioctl's to use it.
>>>
>>> All other atomic helpers can be converted when Daniel's "acquire_ctx
>>> for everyone!" patch series lands.
>>>
>> There's a KMS locking documentation/example in drm_modeset_lock.c.
>> Can you please update that as well?
> Not sure what we should update there? As-is it still works for the
> non-interruptible case. Or do you mean we should have an interruptible
> variant of it too?
>
> Anyway, with the testcase added also for cursor and plane code, patches
> 4&5 also get my Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>
> Any reason you didn't convert the set_config path too? That's probably the
> one most will be stuck in when something goes wrong ... Another one is the
> various get* and setprop calls (but the later needs my patch series
> first).
> -Daniel
I only did the ones I expect to be called most often by frequency.
The atomic ioctl, pageflip, cursor update and setplane for overlays
are likely to be done most. I think we could test all additions like that,
perhaps even the interruptible backoff case, at least for the atomic ioctl. :)
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list